
Another reason would seem to be that I live in Sweden, SWEDEN!! Solar in Sweden?? But the reality is that Sweden gets about 30% as much of the sun's energy as does Sahara, even if it does mostly arrive in those incredibly long summer days. Being fairly certain that the lack of solar panels isn't entirely due to my love of procrastination, I'd say that the reason (blame) lies elsewhere. Ultimately I'm just another solar inspired consumer looking for market incentives and a reasonable payback time to buy and install a system. And for this, Sweden is not another Germany or Japan or even the U.S. where solar incentives abound.
So what do these countries, Germany in particular, offer that Sweden doesn't? T

However, the power companies have started to acquiesce: they will now buy electricity once a number of prohibitely expensive conditions have been met and the electricity producer makes enough noise about it. In a report issued by Elforsk http://www.elforsk.se/solel/ (in Swedish, of course!), an organization that researches electricity issues and is owned by the governmentally owned Svenska Kraftnät http://www.svk.se/, the company that controls Swedish electricity (phew, that was a long intro), it would require about 45 square meters of solar panels to reach "break even". The costs involve metering measurements and reporting - one of the requirements is that energy production be reported hourly!
Well, let's see - back to my solar installation. The roof of my house in the pic is facing west - I'd better choose one of my sheds that has both southern exposure and isn't shaded. A quick measurement reveals that the shed in the picture - it once was the goat house under a former owner - has a roof length of 8 meters and is about 3 meters wide. Covering it entirely, that would give me 24 square meters, or about half the area needed for break even. So I can forget about selling electricity! And, darn it, I'm not at home during the day when the electricity is being produced, thus leaving me no choice but to give it away for free or to sell it at a loss. I could, of course, get very expensive batteries to store it, but that defeats the whole purpose or being grid connected. Or I could get inventive about consuming electricity while not at home. Hmmm... maybe I could get an electric car, which is expensive, leave it at home to charge during the day, then drive around with it all night. Or not.
2 comments:
Isn't it frustratin that Sweden has such restrictive policies regarding selling to the grid. If we want to increase our renewables, this has to change.
I'm however not sure that a strong subsidy would be the best way to go, but at least take away the expenses to sell the electricity. We get 1100€ if we buy a car on ethanol, but nothing if we produce our own electricity and sell it to others.
And while at it.... take away the "abonnemangskonstnad" for buying electricity. Pay instead for what you use, not the concept of having the grid ready to use. Everyone would then get a strong incentive to use less electricity, which of course the companies do not prefer. Sometimes the privatization of state companies isn't very good.
The companies always refer to their infrastructure to maintain... and that costs money. I don't pay a fee to get into ICA to buy my dairy products. Their infrastructures are covered by the price on milk...
Monopoly at its worst...
Nice blog by the way :-)
Tack för inläggen. Fast jag fortsätter på engelska... I, myself, find it very interesting that Elforsk is the company putting forth proposals to make changes in Swedish laws, which is the equivalent of letting the electric companies write consumer laws governing electricity use.
Marta
Post a Comment